Is long-term development work possible in fragile states like Syria, South Sudan and Iraq? Join us 6 Nov, 1-3pm GMT
Sponsored by Adam Smith International
Despite claims that we are living in the most peaceful period in history, the past seven years have seen significant declines in levels of stability around the world. Of the 162 countries included in the Global Peace Index, just 11 nations (pdf) are judged free from conflict. Syria, Afghanistan, South Sudan, Iraq, Somalia, Central African Republic and the Democratic Republic of the Congo were identified as being among the least peaceful countries. In total, 500 million people (pdf) live in countries at risk of instability and conflict.
During conflicts, the primary priorities are providing food, shelter and medical assistance. After a time, and preferably once peace has been re-established, the next step is transitioning to long-term development. But while it is imperative for post-conflict countries to build infrastructure and become self-sufficient, bridging the gap between emergency aid and sustainable development is often fraught with difficulties.
[view whole blog post
]
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
See More
Report Abuse